<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent Posts in 'Physics in a Nutshell for Os and As' | sgForums.com</title>
    <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2297/topics/317357</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://www.sgforums.com/open_search.xml"/>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>Physics in a Nutshell for Os and As replied by eagle @ Tue, 13 May 2008 01:39:52 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p class=""&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=
"text-decoration: underline;"&gt;Breaking down
Physics&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;The best way to solve a big problem is to divide it
into smaller parts, then solve each part individually. Why is this
the best way? Solving a small part involves lesser stress and
mental power than a large part.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;The above principle can be used for many things.
Physics is like the big problem described above. The best way to
learn and understand it is to sub-divide into smaller parts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;So how can we divide physics into smaller parts? In my
opinion, there are five parts in physics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;1) Newtonian Mechanics&lt;br /&gt;
2) Waves and Oscillations&lt;br /&gt;
3) Thermodynamics&lt;br /&gt;
4) Electromagnetism&lt;br /&gt;
5) Modern Physics&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;The first step is to understand each and every single
part. Once the first step is done, the second step is to learn to
draw linkages between these parts to further improve our
problem-solving capabilities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=
"text-decoration: underline;"&gt;Question-based Approach to
Scoring&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;The second part I&#8217;m going to share is the technique of
using questions to improve understanding and scoring for exams. The
main idea behind this is to read the notes once, then do a large
number of questions with your notes/textbook in hand. In this
technique, you are allowed to read and search your notes/textbook
for the answers. However, you are required to do at least 6
complete test papers worth of questions (means just do a lot of
questions).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;This method is what I will emphasize more than merely
memorizing or/and reading and re-reading of the notes. Why do I say
so?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;80% of your
notes/textbooks are useless junks that are not tested in
exams&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;This is not to say that the 80% does not contribute to
greater understanding and interest of the subject. What I meant is
that the important portions of the notes (that will be tested) lies
mainly in 20% of the notes/textbooks. By reading the
notes/textbooks as you do questions, you will (i) be able to focus
more on this important 20% that will most likely be tested, and
(ii) do it in a shorter amount of time. This results in higher
throughput; you learn more in a shorter period of time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=
"text-decoration: underline;"&gt;Conclusion&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;The above two approaches can not only be used in
physics, but in other subjects (and life situations) too. I wish
you success in employing them effectively. Feel free to point out
any errors or misunderstandings, or just ask for
clarifications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=""&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 01:39:52 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2297:317357:8082243</guid>
      <author>eagle</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2297/topics/317357</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
